slickvguy

Comment Stream

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:
  • Yellen's sentiment was echoed by Chicago Fed president Charles Evans, though he tempered his enthusiasm for wide-scale stimulus by calling current policy 'sobering.' "By historical standards, our current fiscal debt is not unusually large; but our expected future obligations are enormous." (full speech)
    Bravo. Perfectly stated.


    On Jan 04 11:50 PM bearfund wrote:

    > Almost but not quite; a bit too much class warfare and not quite
    > enough both sides against the middle. A better expression would be:
    >
    >
    > 1. If you are rich, we will keep you rich.
    >
    > 2. If you are poor because you have no marketable skills and don't
    > care to acquire any, spend too much, and/or can't be bothered to
    > look after yourself, we will give you money to support your bad habits.
    >
    >
    > 3. If you are not "you" in (1) or (2), you are "we" in (1) and (2),
    > and if you don't like it you're welcome to join "you" in (2) by accepting
    > an unlimited stay in federal prison.
    >
    > Some days it sounds a lot better than working for a living.
    >
    > On Jan 04 10:34 PM Jackson Cash wrote:
    Jan 05 02:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View news story
  • Finally, Some Holiday Cheer
    Am I the only one who sees the giddiness today as a sign of extreme desperation? How many pundits have bought into the "trade this Obama bounce"? From Richard Russell to Marc Faber and everyone in-between. I'm slightly long here - I expected this rally. But the higher it goes now, the flatter I'll get, waiting to put on shorts again.

    I don't think that the market has all the bad news built in. It's highly likely that we retest 2008 lows. This rally has that bubble feeling we had in 2000. Ignoring of reality. Optimism is nice - but REALISM is even better. Great values? Sorry - I don't see too many of those. I see lots of relatively lower prices - but that does not mean relatively cheap. To be sure, value is much better than it was a year ago. At SPX 800, I'm a buyer. At SPX 900, much less eager. And the higher we go above 900, the worse the expected reward gets for a value investor. Let others jump on the trend train. Haven't we seen that go bust enough times?

    I'm not a doom and gloomer. We'll get through this eventually. But I see far too much wishing and hoping for rebounds/bottoms rather than recognition that fundamental long-term shifts have taken place. There's still far too much economic damage that needs to get unwound before a healthy recovery can take place. Did bailing out GM and Chrysler for a few months get rid of their problems? Of course not. All those layoffs and business closings are going to suddenly revers? Government trillions will take time to work their way through the system.

    I hope I'm wrong, but I see this as a suckers/delusional rally. The higher it goes, the worse the outcome for those buying into it. When I sense the frantic buying of those who fear they have missed the bottom, it'll be time to short again.
    Jan 03 04:26 am |Rating: +2 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Market Signal: Proceed with Caution
    "If we don’t make a move up right about now, we could have some selling pressure. "

    Man, what would we do without such insight?
    Dec 30 21:32 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Preventing the Depression of 2009
    Yes, just what we need. After having done such a terrific job for so many years, lets give the govt even more power. Unreal. I'm deeply saddened and troubled that I live in a time where the majority's instinct is for more govt control instead of less govt interference.
    Dec 30 20:07 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Buying USO Is a No-Brainer
    On Dec 26 11:49 AM BrotherMaynard wrote:

    > Nothing is a "no brainer" in investing. That sort of cavelier and
    > careless attitude has lost a lot of people money in this environment.

    Bravo.
    And what does "no-brainer" mean? That you have no brains for opening the position? How I hate that phrase.

    Everyone knows that one day commodities will be a huge winner again. Duh. That's always been true in the past, and even more so in the future. But WHAT to buy and more importantly WHEN to buy it is another story completely.

    The fixation on the amount of price decline reminds me of people buying the financials in 2008 because "they can't go lower". Oops. If there's one thing to learn from the past year, it's that there's no sucha thing as "too low". Cheap does not mean low relative price!!! How many value managers (read: Bill Miller) got creamed buying stocks that were lower-priced but NOT cheap (i.e. good value).

    You'd better have a rock-solid strategy mapped out, low or no leverage, and plenty of patience if you take positions now. And no matter how much they've fallen - they can fall much more. Oil falls to $25/bbl - not impossible by any means - it's still quite a haircut from current prices. I make no predictions on prices of commodities. Sadly, unlike almost everyone else, I am not able to predict the future.

    At this point, I think people should focus on managing risk and getting through the sh*tstorm - rather than swinging for fences. Not the time to be a hero.
    Dec 28 00:52 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Wall Street Boys Cautiously Bullish - Barron's
    Who is NOT a "know-nothing&quo... We are ALL know-nothings. Because unless proven otherwise, nobody can predict the future. People can make GUESSES - and then we see who guessed correctly. But even if someone like let's say a Roubini is deemed to have guessed correctly, it still has no bearing on whether he'll be able to correctly guess again in the future. Sooner or later, he'll be wrong, just like all the other gurus who guessed correctly until they didn't.

    Bottom line: Human beings are easily fooled. We just aren't that evolved yet - as much as we like to think we are. Commenter after commenter pretending he or she is brighter than others with no proof whatsoever. And that includes EVERYONE. Nothing - and I mean NOTHING - is as it appears. But we need to fill up our lives doing SOMETHING, so why not waste it reading endless market yammerings that are worthless? lol. Don't be too hard on the predictors et al. Just doing the silly human being thing. Illusions, and all that.

    I'm not sure which of us is more stupid: those who insist on predicting that which they cannot know OR the rest of us who read and comment on the predictions. Round and round we go....


    On Dec 21 05:02 PM hernje wrote:

    > Who in their right mind would put any credence in what these know
    > nothings say? The fact that every one of these 'experts' was completely
    > blind sided by the biggest financial meltdown in the last 100 years
    > shows that they are just a bunch of talking heads, with absolutely
    > no special insight.
    Dec 21 19:02 pm |Rating: +3 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Why Gold Hasn't Been a Hedge Against Inflation
    "The gold-to-oil ratio will keep rising until it comes down."

    Brilliant.
    Dec 21 18:52 pm |Rating: +6 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The "DOPE-DUD" Phase For Canadian Banks?
    Just what we need. More fearmongering without facts. Well done.
    Dec 17 17:41 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Cramer's Stop Trading! (12/12/08) Absence of Panic
    I wish peopel would stop looking at all 3 of the so-called "big 3" as one and the same. Ford is in much better shape than the other two. The chances of Ford surviving and becoming a profitable company are much better than for the other two. Aside from the UAW, let's face it...how many car and truck offerings do we really need? There's just way too much supply and not enough demand. It's unfortunate that so many companies are levered to the auto industry - but this MUST change. The free market has spoken. Since when did it become ok to prop up failing businesses with taxpayer money? Why invest in losers - it makes no sense! I would never favour govt getting involved, but if they must, they should be investing in *WINNERS* - not losers. Encourage investment in new and improving markets - not old unprofitable ones.
    Dec 14 13:56 pm |Rating: +2 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Research in Motion Warns, But Do Individual Stocks Matter Anymore?
    Typical stupidity. Stock price has become everything. Value? What's that? So because everyone else is an idiot - you should do the same. Brilliant. I guess those morons like Buffett and Watsa just don't get it. All the old stuff doesnt' work anymore? Well, here's my take: when the majority of people are saying things like "buy and hold is dead" (translation: I bought companies at way too high a price and ignored them) and "everything we've learned for decades it moot"....the intelligent response is to be a contrarian and do the opposite, i.e. buy great companies at good prices and hold for the long-term. The last time I heard these kinds of things was around the Nasdaq top.

    It is *NOT* different this time. Value investing is the only thing that ever has made sense. Too many people think "buy and hold" means something that it doesn't. The key is *WHAT* you choose to buy and hold, and what PRICE you pay for it versus the VALUE.
    Dec 03 23:31 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Who Will Take Over Citi?
    "Possibly more likely"

    That about says it all. You know nothing about the future. But don't let that stop you from writing. Must write, must write, must write...
    Nov 22 11:02 am |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Citigroup: The End Draws Near
    Well said, sir!


    On Nov 21 08:15 PM bankanalyst wrote:

    > You provide no reasoning other than some irrational and emotional
    > justification based on past precedence (WaMu) that is totally irrrelevant
    > to the current circumstances. Whether or not Citi fails to exist
    > in its current form notwithstanding, your ego driven grandstanding
    > and the reaction you intend to induce is despicable. Reading your
    > bio, i cannot believe you had held such high level positions in the
    > banking system but then again perhaps we are where we are because
    > of people like you. You were despised at CommerceBank despite having
    > 'invented' evening and weekend hours. As many others have noted,
    > you are a legend in your own mind. Go back to your golf and leave
    > this to unbiased professionals. ZERO Value gibberish.
    Nov 21 23:49 pm |Rating: +2 -1 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Citigroup: The End Draws Near
    Another jerk piling on. (Disclosure: not long or short C).
    This is a big part of the problem. People on the net and TV yapping endlessly about things they know nothing about.
    Nov 21 23:47 pm |Rating: +6 -2 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Mitt Romney's NY Times Op-Ed On the Automakers: Dead On
    The USA desperately needs people like Romney to clean up this mess by applying tough, no-nonsense strategies and tactics. it seems that nobody has any backbone left. Extremely difficult decisions have to be made. Everyone has to give. Nobody will be completely happy. Too bad. The Big Three got themselves into this mess - they have no leverage to demand anything. A fleet of corporate jets??? Are you kidding me? Sarah Palin those jets.
    Nov 20 12:10 pm |Rating: +5 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Is Buy-and-Hold Dead? Hardly
    One should buy, hold, or sell based on value versus share price. Buy and hold is too often used as an excuse to buy and NEGLECT. The heroes on Fast Money can yap as long as they want - but we never get to see their actual performance. Hmmm...why is that? They make predictions alld ay long, every day, and some are right and some are wrong. Worthless to individual investors. Bottom line: Do what WEB does - or just give him (or one of the handful of other great value managers) your money.
    Nov 14 18:56 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment |View article

slickvguy's Comments Stream Stats

  • 27 Comments, 32 , 13
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 19